Software validations

We have developed exact analytical solutions of new canonical electromagnetic scattering problems. These new analytical solutions provide benchmarks for the validation of computational electromagnetic software.

You can easily make comparisons with numerical evaluations of the exact analytical solutions by downloading our data and Matlab subroutines that reproduce some of the figures provided in our articles.

• D. Erricolo, M. D. Lockard, C. M. Butler, P. L. E. Uslenghi, “Numerical analysis of penetration, radiation, and scattering for a 2D slotted semielliptical channel filled with isorefractive material,” Progress in Electromagnetic Research (PIER), Vol. 53, 2005, pp. 69-89.  (web, http://hdl.handle.net/10027/11130, Data files )
• D. Erricolo, M. D. Lockard, C. M. Butler, P. L. E. Uslenghi, “Currents on conducting surfaces of a semielliptical-channel-backed slotted screen in an isorefractive environment,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 53, No. 7, July 2005, pp. 2350-2356.  (web, http://hdl.handle.net/10027/11118, Data files)

We have developed also measurements to validate diffraction theories. You can easily make comparisons with our measured results and numerical solutions by downloading our data and Matlab subroutines that reproduce some of the figures provided in our articles.

• T. Negishi, V. Picco, D. Spitzer, D. Erricolo, G. Carluccio, F. Puggelli and M. Albani, “Measurements to Validate the UTD Triple Diffraction Coefficient,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Vol. 62, No. 7, July 2014, pp. 3723-3730.  (web, http://hdl.handle.net/10027/18947, Data files)